Book your Hotel now...

Klook.com

Monday, January 19, 2026

Dairy Box Tuguegarao Advances Local Dairy Industry Through Multi-Agency Support

TUGUEGARAO CITY, Cagayan — The operation of Dairy Box Tuguegarao continues to strengthen market access for locally produced dairy products through the collaborative efforts of the Integrated Farmers Cooperative, the Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR), Department of Agriculture (DA), Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), Department of Science and Technology (DOST), and the Local Government Unit (LGU) of Tuguegarao City.

Dairy Box serves as a dedicated outlet for carabao milk and value-added dairy products produced by farmer-beneficiaries and cooperative members. Products available include fresh carabao milk, pastillas de leche and other milk-based commodities, which provide consumers with nutritious, locally sourced alternatives while generating sustainable income for producers.

The Integrated Farmers Cooperative manages the day-to-day operations and product sourcing, ensuring that benefits directly reach farming communities. DAR supports the initiative as part of its agrarian reform community development efforts, while DA provides technical assistance to enhance dairy production.

DTI contributes through enterprise development, packaging, and market linkage support; DOST provides technical guidance on food processing, quality assurance, and product innovation; and the LGU supports the initiative through local promotion and enabling policy environment.

The multi-agency partnership underscores the government’s commitment to food security, rural enterprise development, and inclusive economic growth. Through continued collaboration, Dairy Box Tuguegarao is positioned as a strategic platform for empowering farmers, strengthening cooperatives, and promoting proudly Filipino agricultural products.

Residents of Tuguegarao City and nearby communities are encouraged to patronize locally produced dairy products through Dairy Box Tuguegarao, a dedicated outlet featuring fresh and value-added milk products made by local farmer-producers and cooperative members.

Dairy Box serves as a community-based marketing platform for high-quality dairy commodities, offering consumers access to fresh carabao milk, pastillas de leche, and other milk-based products. These products are processed using locally sourced milk, ensuring freshness while promoting the use of Philippine-made agricultural commodities.

Carabao milk, one of the outlet’s flagship products, is known for its naturally creamy texture and high nutritional value, particularly in calcium and protein content. Meanwhile, processed products such as pastillas and kesong puti provide consumers with convenient, affordable, and culturally rooted food options suitable for households, students, and professionals.

Beyond product promotion, Dairy Box plays a significant role in supporting livelihood generation and enterprise development among small-scale dairy farmers. By providing a reliable market outlet, it helps improve producers’ income and encourages the growth of community-based agri-enterprises in the province.

The initiative reflects the continuing efforts of stakeholders to promote food security, local economic development, and consumer awareness on the benefits of supporting Filipino-made products. It also strengthens the link between producers and consumers, ensuring that the value of agricultural production is shared more equitably across the supply chain.

The public is invited to visit Dairy Box Tuguegarao and support local dairy products that are nutritious, affordable, and proudly made in Cagayan.

Sunday, January 18, 2026

Government Optimization Act: Can I avail of the retirement benefits and incentives under Republic Act No. 12231 even before promulgation of IRR?

Under Republic Act No. 12231 (Government Optimization Act), retirement benefits and separation incentives are expressly provided for affected government personnel. The law sets out what benefits are available and when they become payable — but the availability of those benefits is structurally tied to implementation actions that depend on the IRR and subsequent administrative steps.

Here’s how it works under the statute:

1. The law already includes retirement benefits and incentives.

Section 13 of the Act states that qualified affected personnel shall be entitled to retirement benefits and separation incentives under existing laws (e.g., RA 1616, RA 660, RA 8291) and additional separation incentives set by RA 12231 itself.

2. The timing of eligibility is linked to implementation actions.

Section 15 of the Act specifies that these retirement benefits and separation incentives “shall be available within sixty (60) days from the issuance of the Notice of Organization, Staffing, and Compensation Action (NOSCA) by the Department of Budget and Management (DBM) to the concerned agencies.”

  • The NOSCA is an administrative action that formally notifies agencies of approved changes under the optimization program (e.g., abolished positions or reorganized structure).

  • Because the issuance of the NOSCA is contingent on the optimization process (which itself depends on the IRR, committee actions, and agency studies), the benefits generally cannot be operationalized until those steps have progressed sufficiently.

3. IRR is required to operationalize procedural details.

The law also states that “the specific guidelines to carry out the provisions of this section shall be prescribed in the IRR of this Act.”

  • This means that while the law creates the entitlement, the IRR will set out procedures (such as documentation requirements, filing processes, and coordinating procedures between agencies and GSIS) that personnel must comply with to actually avail of those benefits.

  • In practice for Philippine statutes, benefit availment and processing typically await IRR or interim guidelines to clarify administrative steps and requirements.

Conclusion (Can you avail benefits before the IRR?):

  • No — you generally cannot effectively avail retirement benefits and incentives under RA 12231 before the promulgation of the IRR and before the relevant administrative triggers (e.g., NOSCA issuance).

  • The statutory entitlement exists, but operational availment and processing require the IRR or corresponding administrative guidelines first.

  • Additionally, the benefits become due only after a NOSCA is issued to your agency, which itself is dependent on completion of optimization actions under the law’s implementation framework.


Monday, January 5, 2026

2025 Agrarian Reform in Cagayan Valley

 2025 Milestones:

1. Mass Distribution of Land Titles and Support Services in Cagayan Valley

A major DAR-led activity took place in December 2025, where thousands of agrarian reform beneficiaries (ARBs) across the region — including Cagayan province — received land titles and support inputs:

  • Certificates of Land Ownership Awards (CLOAs) and split electronic titles (e-titles) were handed out to secure individual land ownership.

  • In the region, 900 ARBs received CLOAs and 1,872 received split e-titles.

  • 1,344 farmers benefited from debt relief under the Certificate of Condonation with Release of Mortgage (COCROM) program.

Farm machinery and equipment worth about Php 45.2 million were distributed, including solar-powered irrigation pumps and tractors. In Cagayan specifically, 2,872 beneficiaries received support valued at over Php 12.4 million.  

The goal of these measures is to boost productivity, reduce production costs, and modernize agriculture to support food security and farmer incomes. This mass distribution reflects sustained efforts by DAR and local officials to accelerate land tenure security and rural development in 2025.

2. Ongoing Individual Titling (Project SPLIT) and Mechanization Support in Cagayan

Earlier in April 2025, DAR-Cagayan offices awarded additional:

  • Electronic land titles under the Support to Parcelization of Lands for Individual Titling (Project SPLIT) covering more than 21 hectares, as well as Regular Land Acquisition and Distribution (LAD) titles.

  • A four-wheel-drive tractor with a rotavator was turned over to a local ARB cooperative to improve farm operations, productivity, and competitiveness.

  • Project SPLIT aims to convert collective agrarian titles into individual ownership, giving farmers legal clarity and stability for credit access and investment decisions. 

Project SPLIT is part of a national DAR goal to distribute up to 396,000 e-titles in 2025, which enhances land titles nationwide and directly impacts farmers in regions like Cagayan through enhanced tenure security and agricultural financing access. 

3. Legal Aid and Farmer Rights Protection Initiatives

In August 2025, DAR launched the “Abogado ti Mannalon” legal aid program in Cagayan Valley, including Cagayan province. The initiative:

  • Provides free legal assistance to farmers for civil, criminal, and administrative cases related to agrarian reform, land disputes, tenancy issues, and other legal needs.

  • It is executed through interagency cooperation with the Department of Justice, Integrated Bar of the Philippines, Public Attorney’s Office, and young lawyer groups to broaden legal support coverage for rural communities.

  • Aims to promote justice and legal empowerment for farmers beyond production assistance. 

This program highlights 2025’s focus on strengthening agrarian rights as a complement to titling and support services.

4. Institutional Strengthening: ARBO Cooperative Registration

Government efforts in 2025 also emphasized institutional capacity building:

  • The Cooperative Development Authority (CDA) and DAR partnership facilitated the registration of 84 Agrarian Reform Beneficiary Organizations (ARBOs) as cooperatives.

  • This cooperative registration drive empowers ARBs to operate as formal farm enterprises with improved access to credit, markets, and capacity building, aligning with national agrarian reform goals. 

5. National Context: Broader Agrarian Reform Targets and Support

The 2025 agrarian reform landscape in the Philippines — including in Cagayan — occurred within a larger national framework:

  • The DAR set an ambitious target to distribute between 300,000 and 400,000 land titles nationwide in 2025 to accelerate agrarian justice. 

  • At the national level, approximately 11,000 farmers in Cagayan Valley and Bicol received land rights and support services, underscoring coordinated national efforts to expand land tenure security. 

  • DAR continues interagency collaboration efforts to enhance rural support and governance frameworks. 

SUMMARY:
Key developments in Cagayan and the region reveal a multi-faceted agrarian reform agenda focused on:

  • Expanding land ownership security through CLOAs and e-titles.

  • Distributing farm machinery, equipment, and agricultural inputs to improve productivity.

  • Implementing legal aid and complaint support to protect farmers’ rights.

  • Strengthening farmer organizations and cooperatives for economic resilience.

  • Contributing to national agrarian reform targets set by DAR with government support.

These actions in 2025 represent substantive progress toward longer-term agrarian justice, rural development, and improved agricultural competitiveness for farmers in Cagayan province.

Tuesday, November 18, 2025

Cagayan ARBO joins 18th National Organic Agriculture Congress (NOAC)

Bacolod City - San Mariano Agrarian Reform Cooperative, an Agrarian Beneficiaries Organization (ARBO) from Lallo, Cagayan, along with other researchers, academic institutions, organic practitioners, and advocates from Cagayan province, participated in the 18th National Organic Agriculture Congress (NOAC) in Bacolod City, strengthening their role in advancing sustainable and climate-resilient farming practices in the Philippines.

The annual congress, hosted by the National Organic Agriculture Board (NOAB) and supported by the Department of Agriculture and Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR), brought together farmers, practitioners, advocates, and policymakers to highlight successful organic production models, new technologies, and market opportunities.

This year’s theme focused on “Organic Agriculture: Strengthening Communities for a Sustainable Future”—a direction strongly aligned with ARBOs’ ongoing efforts to improve farm productivity, reduce input costs, and promote healthier, chemical-free produce.

Primary Activities are: (1) Call for Papers: An invitation for researchers, institutions, organic practitioners, and advocates to submit papers and showcase their work; (2) Presentations: A venue for sharing research findings and innovations in organic agriculture; (3) Networking: An opportunity for participants to connect with industry leaders and other stakeholders in the organic agriculture sector; and (4) Related Events: The congress is part of a larger Organic Agriculture Month celebration that includes the 18th Negros Island Organic Farmers' Festival (November 19-23) and Terra Madre Asia and Pacific (November 19-23).

Many groups also participated in technical sessions on organic certification, regenerative agriculture, composting systems, and enterprise development.

According to DAR provincial representatives, the participation of ARBOs in the congress reflects the agency’s commitment to helping organized farmers compete in premium markets. “Organic agriculture is not only good for the soil—it is good for the farmers’ livelihood. ARBOs are at the forefront of transforming rural food systems,” one official said.

The ARBO delegates also joined business-matching sessions, where they explored partnerships with organic processors, community-supported agriculture (CSA) organizations, and local government units seeking sustainable suppliers.

With rising consumer demand for safe and sustainably grown food, ARBOs aim to strengthen their production systems and tap broader domestic and export markets in the coming year.

The 18th NOAC once again positioned Bacolod as a hub of Philippine organic agriculture—bringing together farmer-leaders, experts, and ARBOs working toward a greener, healthier, and more inclusive agricultural future.

Photos: Ricky Cabanero

Tuesday, November 11, 2025

Demolish and Rebuild: Climate-Proofing Our Houses

As the Philippines faces the growing impact of climate change, from stronger typhoons to rising temperatures and floods, one truth is becoming increasingly clear: our homes, many of which were built decades ago, are no longer built for the climate we live in today. The call to demolish and rebuild is not simply about modernization. It is about climate-proofing our houses—ensuring safety, sustainability, and resilience for the years ahead.

The Problem: Old Homes in a New Climate

Many Filipino homes, particularly in rural and coastal areas, were built using materials and designs suited to the past climate. Wooden walls, galvanized iron sheets, and light concrete may have been sufficient for the storms of the 1980s and 1990s, but not for the supertyphoons and heatwaves we face today. Typhoon Odette, Yolanda, and Ulysses revealed how vulnerable traditional structures are: thousands of homes were swept away, leaving communities to rebuild—again and again.

Climate-Proofing: Building with the Future in Mind

Climate-proof housing means constructing homes that can withstand stronger winds, heavier rainfall, longer droughts, and rising heat. It begins with three essential principles:

  1. Stronger Foundations and Materials

    Use reinforced concrete, elevated flooring, and wind-resistant roofing systems. Materials like fiber cement boards, treated bamboo, or interlocking concrete blocks provide both strength and sustainability.

  2. Smarter Design and Orientation

    A climate-resilient house is not just stronger—it’s smarter. Proper ventilation reduces indoor heat. Wide eaves and green roofs provide shade. Elevated living areas protect against floods. Locating homes away from known hazard zones, whenever possible, also saves lives.

  3. Sustainable Energy and Water Systems

    Solar panels, rainwater catchments, and gray-water recycling systems are not luxuries—they are long-term investments. These reduce utility costs and ensure access to energy and water even when disasters strike.

The Role of Communities and Government

Rebuilding climate-proof communities requires more than individual effort. Local governments and housing authorities must set and enforce climate-resilient building codes. Programs like the Department of Human Settlements and Urban Development’s (DHSUD) Resilient Housing Program and other housing support projects can help rural communities transition to stronger, safer homes.

Community-driven rebuilding also ensures that designs reflect local culture and needs. In Cagayan, for example, post-flood recovery programs have started incorporating elevated stilt houses using local materials, merging tradition with innovation.

Demolish to Rebuild Better

“Demolish and rebuild” may sound drastic—but in many cases, patching and reinforcing old, unsafe homes is more expensive and less effective than starting anew. Rebuilding offers a chance to break the cycle of destruction and repair that drains families and local economies every time a storm hits.

This is not about erasing our old homes’ memories—it’s about protecting the generations that will live in them next.

The Future of Shelter

Climate-proofing our houses is both an environmental and a moral imperative. Every typhoon and flood that passes is a reminder that resilience begins at home. Demolishing unsafe structures and rebuilding with strength, sustainability, and foresight is the foundation of a safer, climate-ready Philippines.

When we rebuild today, let us build not just for ourselves—but for the climate of tomorrow.

Why Typhoon Uwan (Typhoon Fung-Wong) caused floods in Cagayan province

Photo: Philippine Information Agency (PIA)
Where did the floodwaters in Cagayan Province came from during Super Typhoon Uwan (international name Typhoon Fung‑Wong) — and why they surged so badly:

Key sources of flooding

  1. Heavy rainfall from the typhoon

    • The typhoon brought “intense to torrential rains” across northern Luzon including Cagayan Valley. 

    • The rainfall overloaded many rivers and tributaries feeding into the main river systems in the region.

    • For example: “In Cagayan … a flash flood in neighbouring Apayao province had caused the Chico River to burst its banks, sending nearby residents scrambling for higher ground.” 

  2. Overflowing major river system — the Cagayan River

    • Much of the water ended up flowing into the Cagayan River, which runs through Cagayan Province. That river and its many tributaries form a major drainage network for the region. 

    • The valley is structurally predisposed to flooding: for example, the river channel narrows in certain stretches (e.g., the “Magapit Narrows”), slowing outflow and causing water to back up. 

    • As reported: “More than 5,000 people were safely evacuated before the overflowing Cagayan River buried the small city of Tuguegarao about 30 kilometres away.” 

  3. Tributary catchment from surrounding mountains & upstream basins

    • Heavy rainfall in the mountain ranges around the valley causes large volumes of water (and sediment) to rush downstream into the plain. One scientist said:

      “The province serves as a catch basin of water from surrounding mountain ranges… both water and sediments from the mountains cause the rivers to overflow.”

    • Thus, even if the rainfall in the immediate lowland area is not extreme, upstream rainfall can lead to big downstream floods.

  4. Dam operations and reservoir releases (context from prior events)

    • Although I did not find definitive current public reports linking a large dam release to the flooding during Uwan in Cagayan Province, historical cases show this factor has mattered in this region. For example, during Typhoon Ulysses in 2020 the Magat Dam in Isabela Province was releasing water, which then contributed to downstream flooding in Cagayan Province. 

    • For the current typhoon Uwan, the report from Nov 10, 2025 says: “In Cagayan, … a flash flood in neighbouring Apayao province had caused the Chico River to burst its banks.” 

    • So, while dam release could be a factor, the major proximate cause appears to be heavy rainfall and river/tributary overflow.


Why the flooding was so severe in that area

  • The Cagayan Valley is naturally flood-prone: large catchment area, many tributaries, gentle slope in the floodplain, bottlenecks in river channel, and sedimentation reducing capacity. 

  • The heavy rainfall arrived when upstream and tributary systems were likely already saturated, so the added inflow had less ability to be absorbed or delayed.

  • River channel constraints (narrow sections) slow down drainage, causing water to back up and flood adjacent lowlands.

  • Low-lying areas around rivers like the Cagayan, Chico and others are at immediate risk when those rivers overflow.


In short

The floodwaters in Cagayan came primarily from intense rainfall over the region (including upstream mountain and tributary systems) plus overflow of rivers (especially the Cagayan River system) that drained all that water into the province’s lowland areas. Structural and geographic factors (narrow channels, sedimentation, many tributaries) made the flooding worse.

Thursday, November 6, 2025

Cooperatives: Open Doors, but Only for Those Who Belong

Voluntary and Open Ownership in Cooperatives is one of the core principles that guide how cooperatives are formed and managed. It ensures that cooperatives remain inclusive, democratic, and community-oriented, subject to some exemptions expressed by law.

 Voluntary and Open Membership vs. Common Bond of Interest in Cooperatives

These two ideas both relate to cooperative membership, but they emphasize different aspects:

 1. Voluntary and Open Membership (Cooperative Principle)

This is one of the 7 Cooperative Principles from the International Cooperative Alliance (ICA).

Meaning:

*Voluntary – People choose to join or leave the cooperative freely, without force or pressure.

*Open – Membership is open to all persons who are able to use the cooperative’s services and are willing to accept membership responsibilities.

*No discrimination – Race, gender, religion, political belief, or economic status should not be a barrier to joining.

*Key Idea - Everyone qualified is welcome - no one is excluded unfairly.

2. Common Bond of Interest or “Associational Principle”

While cooperatives are open to all, they are not open to everyone in general. Why? Because members must share a common interest or purpose. 

Meaning:

*Members must have a shared bond or objective — like being farmers, employees of the same company, residents of a community, fishermen, vendors, etc.

*This bond helps build trust, unity, and mutual responsibility.

*The cooperative is formed by people with similar needs or economic activities.

*Key Idea- Membership is open - but only to those who share the cooperative’s purpose or field of activity.

Cooperatives are open, but not for just anybody. They are open to all individuals who share the cooperative’s common purpose and agree to its responsibilities.

Simple Example:

*A teachers' cooperative: Voluntary and Open; Any teacher can join; they cannot be excluded for personal reasons like religion or gender.

Common Bond: Only teachers (or employees in the education sector) can be members — not doctors or farmers.

Cooperatives practice voluntary and open membership to welcome all eligible individuals without discrimination — but they also require a common bond of interest to ensure members share the same goals and needs.

Why Not Everyone Can Be Part of a Cooperative

Many people believe that cooperatives are open to everyone — that anyone who wants to join should be allowed in. And while this sounds good, it isn’t entirely true. Cooperatives are built on the principle of voluntary and open membership, but this openness comes with an important condition: members must share a common bond of interest.

A cooperative is not just a business; it is a community of people who face the same challenges and work together for the same goals. Farmers form a cooperative because they understand the hardship of planting, harvesting, and selling crops. Teachers form a cooperative because they share the same salary schedules, loan needs, and workplace conditions. Fisherfolk, drivers, vendors — each group has its own cooperative because they have something in common that binds them together.

So yes, membership is open — but only to those who belong to that shared purpose.

Imagine a farmers’ cooperative suddenly accepting people who do not farm — a store owner, a government employee, or a business investor who has never planted rice or held a plow. These people may have good intentions, but they do not share the same struggles, risks, or needs. They do not understand the life of a farmer. If too many join, the cooperative might start serving interests that are no longer about farmers. Slowly, the cooperative loses its identity.

This is why the law, Republic Act No. 9520 (AN ACT AMENDING THE COOPERATIVE CODE OF THE PHILIPPINES TO BE KNOWN AS THE “PHILIPPINE COOPERATIVE CODE OF 2008”), clearly states that cooperatives must be formed by people with a common bond of interest. It could be based on where they live, what they do for a living, or where they work. This bond is not meant to exclude or discriminate. It is meant to protect the cooperative and make sure it remains relevant to the people it serves.

Because when people understand each other — when they have the same needs, the same dreams — trust is easier to build. Decisions are easier to make. Problems are easier to solve. And the cooperative becomes stronger.

So, when we say cooperatives are open to all, what we really mean is: they are open to all who are part of the group they were created to serve, and who are willing to carry the responsibilities that come with being a member.

The Ties That Bind: What Connects Members of a Cooperative

A cooperative is not just a group of people doing business together. It is a community of individuals who share something deeper — a common bond of interest. This bond is what holds the cooperative together. It creates unity, trust, and a shared sense of responsibility. Without it, a cooperative is just another organization.

In many cooperatives, this bond starts with place, as for example. People who live in the same barangay or town form a cooperative because they face the same community problems — high prices in local stores, lack of access to basic goods, or the need for clean water, credit, or livelihood support. They know each other. They see each other every day. Their lives are connected by their community. That is a residential bond.

In other cases, the bond is work or livelihood. Farmers come together because they all struggle with buying fertilizers, selling crops at fair prices, or accessing capital. Fishermen, drivers, vendors, and teachers do the same. They create cooperatives not because they are friends, but because they share the same daily challenges and opportunities. This is known as an occupational or associational bond.

There are also cooperatives formed within offices or institutions. Employees working for the same school, hospital, factory, or government agency often build a cooperative so they can save money, apply for loans, and support one another during emergencies. They trust each other because they work under the same employer, follow the same policies, and depend on the same salaries. This is called an institutional bond.

Some cooperatives are born from a shared identity or advocacy. These include cooperatives of women, youth, elderly citizens, or indigenous communities. Their bond is not just economic — it is social. They come together because they understand one another’s struggles and stand together for the same cause.

No matter what form it takes, this common bond is what makes a cooperative unique. It gives members a sense of belonging. It ensures that decisions are made not for personal gain, but for the good of all. The cooperative becomes a reflection of the members’ shared life — their work, their community, their dreams.

That is why cooperatives are strong: because they are built not on money alone, but on trust, shared experiences, and a common purpose.

Not everyone can or should join — and that’s not to keep people out, but to keep the cooperative true to its purpose. 

Tuesday, November 4, 2025

ARB households in ARCs associated with higher incomes, lower poverty incidence, and better welfare outcomes.


Studies on agrarian reform in the Philippines show the role of the Agrarian Reform Community 
(ARC) approach in the Philippines and how membership in an ARC is associated with better incomes and welfare outcomes among agrarian reform beneficiaries (ARBs):

Impact of Agrarian Reform on Poverty (Celia M. Reyes, 2002)

  • Using panel data from ~1,500 farming households (1990 and 2000), the study finds that being an ARB and being in an agrarian reform community (ARC) increases the probability of being non-poor

  • It also shows that ARB households in ARC areas had higher real per capita incomes and lower poverty incidence compared to non-ARBs.

  • The study explicitly mentions: “being in an agrarian reform community also has the same effect” of increasing the chance of being non-poor. 

Agrarian Reform and Poverty Reduction in the Philippines (Arsenio M. Balisacan & others, 2007)

  • The paper describes the ARC approach (launched in 1993), which “concentrates resources in selected areas to deliver support services” rather than dispersing them broadly. 

  • It asserts that “the ARC approach … if properly implemented, improves the economic conditions, social capital, and democratic participation of the communities.” 

  • While it does not always report precise income coefficients for ARCs in all cases, it identifies ARCs as a key channel for delivering complementary services that enhance the poverty-reduction impact of agrarian reform.

Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP): Time to Let Go (Raul V. Fabella, 2014)

  • This review paper notes that a 2011 internal DAR study (the “ARC Level of Development Assessment (ALDA)”) found that among ARBs in ARCs:

    “the average yield (ton/hectare) among ARC beneficiaries in palay was 10 percent higher than the national average … in corn it was 50 percent higher” and that ARCs receive more credit and irrigation support. 

  • Although not purely income data, the yield and support-service data support the link between ARC membership and improved productivity/investment, which ties to higher incomes.

Economic Evaluation of Agrarian Reform Beneficiaries in Agrarian Reform Communities in Nueva Ecija (Johnah Jefferson Mercado, Alma Dela Cruz & Ma. Pamela Roguel, 2021)

  • This more recent case study investigates two ARCs in Nueva Ecija and evaluates support services, infrastructure and income/benefit outcomes. 

  • While the full paper may need to be accessed for detailed income figures, it provides empirical evidence of ARCs being privileged in terms of infrastructure and support, which correlates with better outcomes.

Summary of Evidence

  • There is empirical support that being part of an ARC (i.e., a cluster of ARB households with concentrated support services) is associated with higher incomes, lower poverty incidence, and better welfare outcomes.

  • The mechanism is that ARCs allow for targeted delivery of infrastructure, credit, irrigation, extension services and community organization, which amplify the benefits of land-reform.

  • The evidence is stronger in some cases (like the Reyes 2002 study) and somewhat weaker or mixed in others—but taken together, the weight of evidence supports the proposition that ARCs matter.

Monday, November 3, 2025

ARBs who were given lands under RA 6657 (CARL) may still be qualified as beneficiaries of 4Ps under RA 11310 (4Ps Act)

ARBs who are awarded agricultural lands under RA 6657 (CARL) are not automatically considered
poor or not poor under the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps) of RA 11310.

Whether they are considered “poor” depends on whether they meet the poverty criteria defined under the 4Ps Law—not on whether they own land.

Does owning land as an ARB remove a household from being considered “poor”? No. Land ownership is not a basis for exclusion.                                                                                        

How does 4Ps define “poor”? Households classified as poor or near-poor by the National Household Targeting System for Poverty Reduction (Listahanan), based on income and living conditions.

Are farmers or ARBs excluded from 4Ps? No. In fact, farmers and farmworkers are priority sectors for inclusion in 4Ps under RA 11310.                                                                   

So, can an ARB household still be considered “poor” and qualify for 4Ps?  Yes—if they are still income-poor and meet 4Ps conditions.

Legal Bases

1.   RA 6657 (Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law).  Provides that qualified farmers and farmworkers may be awarded land.  The law does not state that once awarded land, ARBs are no longer poor or disqualified from social welfare benefits.  Many ARBs remain economically poor despite land ownership due to lack of capital, irrigation, markets, or support services.

2.     RA 11310 (4Ps Act), Section 6.  A household is eligible for 4Ps if: (1) Classified as poor or near-poor by the National Household Targeting System (Listahanan); (2) Has children 0–18 years old or a pregnant member; (3) Agrees to comply with health and education conditions.  Section 6(c) further states that households of farmers, fisherfolk, and farmworkers are priority sectors for inclusion in the targeting system. This means ARBs are “priority for inclusion”—not excluded.

Conclusion

*ARBs who were awarded land may still be classified as poor under the 4Ps Law.

*Land ownership does not automatically mean they are no longer poor.

*What matters is income, access to services, and living standards—not land title alone.

* If the ARB household still lives below the poverty threshold and meets 4Ps conditions, they remain qualified.

Monday, October 20, 2025

DARPO-Cagayan Evaluates 90 Agrarian Reform Beneficiaries Organizations under IT-eASy (ITEMA) Assessment

Tuguegarao City, Cagayan - The Department of Agrarian Reform Provincial Office (DARPO) Cagayan has successfully completed the Information Technology-enabled Maturity Assessment System (IT-eASy, formerly ITEMA) for 90 Agrarian Reform Beneficiaries’ Organizations (ARBOs) across the province, marking a milestone in assessing organizational maturity, sustainability, and capacity for enterprise growth.

The IT-eASy (ITEMA) is a digitalized monitoring and evaluation tool developed by DAR to determine the readiness and maturity level of ARBOs in managing agribusiness enterprises. It measures five key areas-Governance, Organizational Management, Resource Management, Enterprise Development, and Financial Performance - to classify cooperatives into five maturity levels, from Level 1 (Emerging) to Level 5 (Sustaining).

16 ARBOs Achieve Maturity Level 5

Out of the 90 ARBOs assessed in Cagayan, 16 organizations reached the highest Maturity Level 5, signifying strong institutional stability, operational excellence, and sustainable enterprise performance.

Leading the list is the Nararagan Valley Multi-Purpose Cooperative (Ballesteros), which topped the province with a score of 73 points. Other high-performing ARBOs include:

*Villarey ARB Cooperative (Piat) – 70.3

*Concepcion Agrarian Reform Cooperative (Amulung) – 70.1

*Payagan Farmers Cooperative (Ballesteros) – 70

*Sunrise Multi-Purpose Cooperative (Gattaran) – 67.5

*Maguing Farmers MPC (Gonzaga) – 66.3

*Calayan Samahang Nayon MPC (Gonzaga) – 66.2

*Cabayabasan Farmers Credit Cooperative (Lal-lo) – 65.5

  and several others that showed exceptional enterprise management.

22 ARBOs at Level 4, 34 at Level 3

Meanwhile, 22 ARBOs were classified under Maturity Level 4, demonstrating consistent growth but still requiring further development in governance and enterprise scaling. 34 ARBOs landed at Level 3, indicating progressing organizations that are in the consolidation phase of enterprise management.

 Emerging ARBOs: Levels 1 and 2

A total of 18 ARBOs fell under Levels 1 and 2, representing emerging and developing organizations that need strengthened capacity building, financial literacy, and market linkage interventions. DARPO-Cagayan will provide focused technical assistance and organizational strengthening programs to help these cooperatives improve their performance and sustainability.

Strengthening Agrarian Reform Enterprise Development

DARPO-Cagayan Provincial Agrarian Reform Program Officer II Val M. Cristobal emphasized that the ITEMA results are vital in planning future interventions for ARBOs under the Agrarian Reform Beneficiaries Development and Sustainability Program (ARBDSP).

“The IT-eASy assessment allows us to identify where our ARBOs stand in terms of governance, operations, and business viability. It helps us design the right support packages—whether capacity building, market linkages, or enterprise financing,” PARPO II Cristobal said.

The DAR’s ITEMA initiative supports the national goal of empowering agrarian reform beneficiaries toward self-reliant, business-oriented, and resilient cooperatives capable of sustaining rural livelihoods and contributing to local economic development.

 

FEATURED POST

Dairy Box Tuguegarao Advances Local Dairy Industry Through Multi-Agency Support

TUGUEGARAO CITY, Cagayan — The operation of Dairy Box Tuguegarao continues to strengthen market access for locally produced dairy product...